• Live
    • Audio Only
  • google plus
  • facebook
  • twitter
News > World

UK Lawyers Deleted Emails Regarding Assange Case

  • WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange makes a speech from the balcony of the Ecuadorean embassy, in central London, Feb. 5, 2016.

    WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange makes a speech from the balcony of the Ecuadorean embassy, in central London, Feb. 5, 2016. | Photo: Reuters

Published 10 November 2017

U.K. lawyers deleted important emails regarding Julian Assange’s possible extradition to Sweden and the United States.

An Italian reporter revealed that the U.K.'s Crown Prosecution Service deleted important emails regarding Julian Assange’s case and convinced Swedish officials to forgo interviews with the Wikileaks founder in London.

First Charges Filed in Russian Interference Investigation

Italian journalist Stefania Maurizi, working for the Italy-based, La Repubblica, found that CPS lawyers handling Assange’s extradition to Sweden for rape charges purged critical emails related to the case and possible extradition to Sweden. A key lawyer retired from the CPS in 2014.

Maurizi has been investigating the Australian’s case since 2009. During her research not only did she find that Assange-related emails were permanently deleted, she found that parts of critical emails regarding the Assange case provided by the CPS were modified compared to the same emails provided to her by Swedish lawyers.

In addition, Maurizi read in existing emails she obtained after filing a Freedom of Information petition, that CPS had actively discouraged Swedish lawyers from traveling to London “in 2010 or 2011 ... to interview Assange” regarding rape accusations from two Swedish women against the whistleblower.

An email from a CPS lawyer from Jan. 25, 2011 read, “my earlier advice remains, that in my view it would not be prudent for the Swedish authorities to try to interview the defendant in the U.K.”

British experts on freedom of information petitions suspect that had these interviews occurred, it’s unlikely Assange would have had to seek asylum in Ecuador’s British embassy in 2012.

Assange refused to travel to Sweden regarding the rape case for fear Swedish officials would extradite him to the United States, where he is considered a “priority” for disclosing classified U.S. embassy information in 2009 and 2010.

Maurizi is trying to uncover whether the U.S. was involved in influencing U.K. or Swedish officials to attempt to force Assange’s travel to Sweden regarding the rape case, risking extradition to the United States.

The Rising of Britain's 'New Politics'’

Of the CPS-deleted emails Maurizi wrote, “it is incredible to me these records about an ongoing and high-profile case have been destroyed. I think they have something to hide.” CPS officials have said it’s standard practice to purge emails and “related material … three years following the conclusion of proceedings, or for the duration of the convicted defendant’s sentence plus three months.”

The CPS claims the Assange case concluded in 2012 and related emails were fair game to delete forever, saying it's unlikely much information regarding Assange was lost in the purge.

An informal tribunal in London will hear Stefania Maurizi’s case this week.

Former Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa granted Assange asylum in 2012 in its British embassy in London sharing the fear his life was in danger. Current President Lenin Moreno, told RT in late September, “we will continue to give him (Assange) patronage for as long as we assume that his life may be in danger.”

The charges of rape against Assange were dropped in May.

Post with no comments.