• Live
    • Audio Only
  • google plus
  • facebook
  • twitter
News > Latin America

Mining Employees Face Homicide Charges over Brazil Dam Disaster

  • Activists stage a die-in to protest contamination of Brazil's Doce River by a mining tailings pond dam breach at the Samarco iron ore mine.

    Activists stage a die-in to protest contamination of Brazil's Doce River by a mining tailings pond dam breach at the Samarco iron ore mine. | Photo: Reuters

Published 21 October 2016
Opinion

The individuals charged for this disaster could face sentences of between 12 and 30 years in prison.

Prosecutors in Brazil have filed homicide charges against 21 people responsible for an iron ore mine disaster in the state of Minas Gerais that killed 19 people last year.

GALLERY: ​
Biggest Ecological Disaster in Brazil's History

The accused are current and former top executives of Brazil's Samarco, which is owned by the companies Vale and BHP Billiton. Those chared include several Brazilians, two U.S. citizens, a South African, an Australian, a French man and a Briton.

Last November a mining dam collapsed, killing 19 people and polluting miles of Brazil's waterways. The mud from the dams spread to nearby towns, causing flooding and displacing hundreds of people. The contaminated mud was filled with mining waste material.

The individuals charged for this disaster could face sentences of between 12 and 30 years in prison.

Prosecutors claim employees of BHP and Vale knew there was a risk of collapse but ignored it, prioritizing their profits over the safety of local people. However, the companies have denied the accusation and said they will defend their people.

WATCH: Brazil: Arsenic Found in River Polluted by Mine Waste

“BHP Billiton Brazil rejects outright the charges against the company and the affected individuals. We will defend the charges against the company, and fully support each of the affected individuals in their defense of the charges against them,” the company said in an official statement.

Executives from both companies also claimed that the prosecutors ignored the fact that when the disaster occurred, they took responsibility for it and created a joint fund for the recovery costs.

Comment
0
Comments
Post with no comments.