“Iran cannot develop nuclear weapons,” President Donald J. Trump declared firmly, underscoring his administration’s hardline stance amid the latest escalations between Israel and Iran. Yet, the complexity of Washington’s approach reveals deep fissures within U.S. political circles and diplomatic strategies, casting uncertainty over the region’s future.

RELATED:

Israel Kills Iranian Nuclear Scientists in Targeted Strike

Since taking office in January 2025, President Trump has positioned himself as a staunch ally of Israel, affirming unequivocal support for Tel Aviv’s security while insisting on a diplomatic solution to prevent Iran’s nuclear ambitions. His administration has maintained stringent sanctions against Tehran, emphasizing that they will remain until a verifiable agreement is reached.

Marco Rubio, U.S. Secretary of State and a key figure in shaping Washington’s Middle East policy, has echoed the president’s message. Rubio has publicly stated that the U.S. had no direct involvement in Israel’s recent strikes against Iranian nuclear scientists but stressed America’s commitment to protecting its personnel and interests in the region. He has warned Tehran against any retaliation targeting U.S. forces or assets, reinforcing a policy of deterrence through diplomatic pressure and military readiness.

In an unprecedented move, Steve Witkoff, a businessman and Trump confidant appointed as the Special Envoy to the Middle East, is taking a hands-on role in ongoing diplomacy. Witkoff is set to attend nuclear talks in Oman, scheduled for mid-June 2025, aiming to revive dialogue after Iran suspended negotiations following the Israeli strikes. Despite lacking formal diplomatic experience, Witkoff’s appointment signals Washington’s intent to apply unconventional pressure on Tehran and engage regional partners in brokering a settlement.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to press the U.S. for a tougher stance against Iran’s nuclear program. Netanyahu has publicly questioned the viability of the current negotiations, demanding a complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear and missile infrastructure. His government’s recent targeted attacks, which resulted in the deaths of key Iranian nuclear figures, have only heightened tensions and complicated diplomatic efforts.

On the Iranian side, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the strikes and immediately suspended nuclear talks, accusing Israel and its allies of sabotaging the diplomatic process. The loss of high-profile nuclear scientists, including General Hossein Salami of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and physicist Fereydoun Abbasi, has delivered a severe blow to Iran’s program and escalated calls within Tehran for retaliation.

The Trump administration faces the challenge of balancing unwavering support for Israel with the risk of a broader regional conflict. While sanctions remain a central tool, U.S. officials recognize that military escalation could undermine diplomatic progress and destabilize the entire Middle East.

As Washington navigates this volatile moment, the political divisions within and the influence of non-traditional envoys like Witkoff highlight the uncertainty surrounding the U.S. role in de-escalating one of the world’s most dangerous crises.

IN THIS ARTICLE