Tulsi Gabbard, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, not only contradicts official intelligence reports but also reverses her own previous statements to align with Trump’s alarmist claims about Iran’s nuclear weapons, prioritizing political loyalty over truth.

Related:

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi Denounces Israeli Aggression as War Crimes at UN Human Rights Council

Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, has sparked controversy by publicly backing former President Donald Trump’s warnings that Iran is “weeks or months” away from producing a nuclear weapon.

This position directly contradicts recent official intelligence reports and, notably, reverses her own earlier statements that Iran had suspended its nuclear weapons program since 2003 and was not actively building a bomb. Gabbard’s shifting narrative reveals a troubling prioritization of political loyalty to Trump over commitment to factual accuracy.

Reversing Her Own Words: A Dangerous Flip-Flop

Previously, Gabbard had affirmed that “the community of intelligence continues to evaluate that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon” and that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei had not authorized nuclear arms development. She also emphasized ongoing diplomatic efforts and cautioned against premature alarmism.

Now, in a sharp reversal, Gabbard claims Iran is on the brink of nuclear weaponization, accusing “dishonest media” of misrepresenting her testimony. This inconsistency undermines her credibility and raises questions about the politicization of intelligence.

The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division. America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the… pic.twitter.com/mYxjpJY2ud

— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) June 20, 2025

Undermining Diplomacy and Fueling Imperialist Agendas

Gabbard’s alignment with Trump’s hawkish rhetoric comes at a time when diplomatic channels remain open, and peaceful resolutions are still possible. Her contradictory statements risk sabotaging these efforts and provide justification for aggressive U.S. policies aimed at escalating conflict in the Middle East.

Such behavior reflects a broader pattern of imperialist powers manipulating intelligence to serve geopolitical interests, disregarding truth and the sovereignty of nations like Iran.

The discord between Gabbard’s latest claims, official U.S. intelligence assessments, and Israeli intelligence estimates highlights deep divisions within the U.S. establishment. While some Israeli sources warn of imminent nuclear weapon development, the majority of U.S. analysts maintain that Iran has not committed to weaponization.

Gabbard’s choice to abandon her own earlier, more measured position in favor of alarmist claims aligned with Trump’s agenda exemplifies how political loyalty can distort intelligence and endanger global peace.

Tulsi Gabbard’s contradictory stance,disregarding both official reports and her own prior statements,exemplifies the peril of subordinating truth to partisan loyalty. This incoherence threatens diplomatic solutions and fuels imperialist aggression under the guise of security concerns.

This perspective aligns with left-wing critiques of U.S. foreign policy that emphasize the consequences of military occupation and sanctions, arguing that Iran’s defensive posture is a reaction to decades of external aggression.

Disputes Within U.S. Leadership and Intelligence Community

The divergence between Gabbard and other U.S. intelligence officials has sparked debate within Washington. While some Israeli intelligence sources, notably Mossad, estimate Iran could finalize a nuclear weapon in as little as 15 days, many U.S. analysts maintain a more cautious timeline of several months to a year.

Former President Trump himself has publicly questioned the accuracy of intelligence reports, dismissing some assessments as flawed. This discord reveals the complex interplay of political agendas and intelligence interpretation in the ongoing Iran debate.

The statements by Tulsi Gabbard, a prominent figure who has often challenged establishment narratives, underscore the need for a multipolar and nuanced understanding of Iran’s nuclear program. These developments highlight the dangers of militarized rhetoric and the importance of respecting national sovereignty in global diplomacy.

IN THIS ARTICLE